#SIMONS QUEST REDACTED DOWNLOAD#

Personally, I have every intention to add as many prominent ROM hacks into the database as possible with their publish dates, hack developers, screen shots, and fan box art/ backgrounds. Aren't those pretty similar? The only difference being the engine the game is based off of.

#SIMONS QUEST REDACTED DOWNLOAD#

There are unofficial cartridgeВ releases of Kaizo you can find in gaming stores, but AM2R has been kinda pushed into sketchy areas to download because of Nintendo's DMCA take down. Why is AM2R in the database, but Kaizo Mario World not? Kaizo has a huge following (not to mention is probably in quite a few LB user's collections) В is more well known than AM2R to general gamers В and even has it's own Wikipedia entry ( ). I was unaware of such a NO HACKS rule when I submitted (as I said, this was a dry run to see how long the process took.) I don't understand if each submission has to be reviewed regardless of if it's a hack or not, why hacks are automatically discarded. How many times we need to say NO HACKS on database until we have some special markers or section for them? Too much bad data or inappropriate images. I also included information on the hack and the developer from it's page, screen shots from personal gameplay, a banner I modified from some fan art, and a fan art background. It'sВ a hack that's gained a bit of a following and has box art made for it that's commonly distributed by dealers of fan game cartridges. I tried for my first ever submission to the DB the game Super Mario Bros. I don't understand why they need to be partitioned from other games when they themselves are games that are a predominant feature in emulation. Personally, I prefer having the official versions of games when I can, but not if the official versions are obviously and objectively inferior to the unofficial ones.I mean, I got the whole inappropriate images thing on some, but I mean there are dozens that have well documented information on the hack's creation, fairly well known box art, & in general is a well known game as far as emulation goes. There should have been some barebones effort put in if I'm gonna pay 20 bucks for a bunch of 90 minute games from the 1980s.

If Konami wants people to buy these games from them, then they should have fixed them. But even if they aren't big flaws, they're objective flaws that have been fixed by fans for free. You could say the translations and censorship don't matter that much to the games themselves, and sure, that's true.

or to go an find the Redacted romhack of the game that improves at least a. This reproduction is a cart version of a Castlevania 2 hack that fixes all the text the. So why bother with this half-assed official version when there are superior unofficial versions? With that said, if theres one thing that Simons Quest ought to be praised. Castlevania 2 reproduction Castlevania 2 Simons Quest Redacted. I can play Castlevania III and IV uncensored. My point is that there are superior versions of Castlevania II to play made by fans, so why would I play this re-release? With romhacks, I can play Castlevania II retranslated with proper instructions, transitions, and it's uncensored.

It's the gameplay that makes Castlevania games great, not the silly stories, regardless of the quality of the translation of said story. DT Scurvy, you said 'If not, what's the point of playing this version?' - dude, nobody plays Castlevania games for their story.

Simons quest redacted